2015 International Free Agent Report: Rusney Castillo

July 16, 2014

Rusney Castillo Peraza was born on June 8th, 1987, in Cuba’s central province of Ciego de Ávila. He grew into an athletic 5’9” frame, and showed enough skill on the baseball-crazy island to land a spot on the Los Tigres, the nickname for Ciego de Ávila’s team in La Serie Nacional. In his first two years with the team, he received only limited playing time, getting into only 28 games in his rookie year and 44 in his sophomore year. With the departure of centerfielder/right fielder Ricardo Bordon after the 49th Serie Nacional (2009-2010), the right-hander got a major boost in playing time, and he made the most of the opportunity, not only seizing a starting position in the outfield, but becoming one of the better hitters on the Ciego de Ávila team.

Around the same time, he came into prominence on the Cuban National Baseball Team as well. Previously blocked by talents such as Yoenis Cespedes and Leonys Martin, the burgeoning talent soon found himself starting for the team in international contests with their defections. He handled himself well in various competitions; he hit .512/.524/.854 in the 2011 Baseball World Cup, .333 during the 2012 Haarlem Baseball Week, .273/.333/.318 in the 2011 Pan American Games, among other competitions.

Though he was on the provisional roster, Castillo was left off of the final roster of the Cuban National Team in the 2013 World Baseball Classic, replaced by 22-year-old Guillermo Heredia in centerfield instead. This came on the heels of a suspension for a “violation of the code of ethics of revolutionary baseball”. What was his infraction? While we don’t exactly know, odds are, he attempted to flee the country and defect, but was discovered. According to the Havana Times, “a pattern has developed especially over the last decade whereby Cuban baseball stars and top prospects attempt to leave the island illegally and are caught and suspended from playing in the Cuban league. With no choice left to them to continue in their profession, they then succeed at a future attempt escaping to a neighboring country.” Sure enough, Castillo attempted to leave the island once more, and was successful.

In early June, he was granted official free agent status by the MLB after establishing permanent residency in the Dominican Republic and being unblocked by the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. He selected Roc Nation Sports, notably headed by rapper Jay-Z, as his representation, and is set to begin hosting showcases in front of other teams shortly, as soon as a broken finger that he has been nursing is fully healed. He had previously worked out exclusively in front of Dodgers scouts, but their interest at this point in time remains unknown.

Year Age G PA AVG OBP SLG HR BB K SB
2008-2009 (48th SNdB) 22 28 43 .349 .417 .465 0 4 10 0/2
2009-2010 (49th SNdB) 23 44 99 .303 .333 .404 2 2 19 2/6
2010-2011 (50th SNdB) 24 107 441 .320 .369 .553 22 21 53 32/39
2011-2012 (51st SNdB) 25 113 448 .342 .408 .574 21 41 49 27/34
2012-2013 (52nd SNdB) 26 68 234 .274 .377 .393 6 31 29 15/24

(Source: www.beisbolcubano.cu)

 

According to Baseball America’s Ben Badler, “His best tool is his speed, as he’s an above-average runner and one of the better base stealers in Cuba. More of a doubles hitter than a big home run threat, Castillo puts a charge into the ball with a line drive right-handed swing, though he can get long to the ball at times and some scouts think he’s prone to chasing pitches off the plate.”

Castillo is an outfielder by trade, spending most of his time in Cuba patrolling centerfield. He began his baseball career as an infielder, playing second and third base, but when he was finally getting regular playing time with Ciego de Ávila, it was in the outfield. His natural tools simply play up better there- his plus speed allows him to cover a lot of ground, and his arm is solid enough to keep runners honest. His arm does not appear a plus tool, though, and as such, the right-hander is likely destined for either left field or center.

Scouts differ as to how much of an impact the right-hander might have in the MLB. Because of the mechanics of his swing and his tendencies at the plate, coupled by the fact that his career batting line in La Serie Nacional isn’t exactly as impressive as it might seem because of the inflated offensive environment that exists in Cuba, some see him as a fourth outfielder, or a starter on a second division team. Still, as Ben Badler notes, teams are eager to see Castillo work out, as the possibility of adding an MLB-ready prospect without any catch other than money is too good to pass up.

 

Does He Make Sense For The Mets?

The first question is: how much might the right-hander cost? Fellow Cuban outfielder Daniel Carbonell signed with the San Fransisco Giants on June 16th, inking a four-year, $1.4 million deal with a $1 million signing bonus. Unlike Castillo, the 23-year-old Carbonell is more projection than anything else, possessing plus speed and a decent arm, but not too much else. Carbonell will also be assigned to one of the Giants’ MiLB affiliates for the 2014 season, and likely beyond; Rusney Castillo is as close enough to a finished product as you’re going to get from Cuban defectors, and can theoretically have an impact on the 2014 season once signed- though, given the amount of time since he last played a professional game, some tuning up in the minor leagues is certainly necessary. As a result, he will make more money than the Giants’ new farmhand.

Other Cuban outfielders may present better gauges as to what Castillo might get. Leonys Martin, 23 at the time, inked a five-year, $15.5 million contract with the Texas Rangers in May 2011 and spent the better part of two years in their developmental system. Yoenis Cespedes, 26 at the time, inked a four-year, $36 million contract with the Oakland Athletics in February 2012, and immediately made the MLB team. Jorge Soler, 20 at the time, inked a nine-year, $30 million contract with the Chicago Cubs in June 2012, and has yet to debut in the MLB. Yasiel Puig, 21 at the time, inked a seven-year, $42 million contract with the Los Angeles Dodgers in June 2012, and spent roughly a calendar year in their developmental system. Dariel Alvarez, 24 at the time, inked a deal worth $800,000 with the Baltimore Orioles in July 2013, and has yet to debut in the MLB. Of that group, Rusney Castillo most closely resembles Leonys Martin- a centerfielder with plus speed, a good glove, and a light bat. He does not have the overall talent that Cespedes, Soler, and Puig possess, but seems a more overall complete player than Alvarez.

Assuming the Cuban centerfielder can be signed for a total sum in the range of $10-$20 million dollars, for anywhere between three and five years, is he a fit with the Mets? Juan Lagares and Curtis Granderson can reasonably be penciled in for centerfield and one of the corner positions (most likely right field), so the other corner position is where Castillo might be slotted in. Currently, the Mets’ most likely internal options include Eric Young Jr., Kirk Nieuwinhuis, Andrew Brown, and Cesar Puello. Does Castillo represent a clear-cut upgrade over those players? And, if he does, would it be enough of an upgrade to justify the money being spent?


Yet Again, The New York Sports Media Strikes Out

July 12, 2012

The mainstream sports media is a far cry from what it should be, given the climate of freedom that journalism is granted in the United States, and the relatively lighthearted subject matter that it ensconces. The “blogosphere” and other independent news outlets are often just as bad. For the most part, stories rely on tired tropes and narratives, stripped down to the most common denominator for the average reader to understand without having to think much. For most people, that’s fine- sports are a diversion from more important things, a passion to share around the water cooler during a down moment, something to watch or listen to when nothing else is on, a fun thing to go to on the weekend with friends or family.

For other people (like me), the tired tropes and forced narratives are a source of endless frustration. For the past five years or so, Mets fans like myself have had to bear the brunt of endless tropes and forced narratives, where the truth is twisted, bent, and flipped around to produce a story that will sell the most papers, get the most page views, and have the most people flip to your channel. While many of the ‘misadventures’ of Mets players or staff are legitimate, just as many stories are forced and twisted to deliver a narrative that many like to call ‘LOLMets’. Over these last few years, these ‘LOLMets’ stories seem endless- the uproar about Tom Glavine not feeling devastated about his performance on the last game in 2007, the worst in his life (in his own words, he reserves ‘devastated’ for things more important in life than baseball games, like death); The uproar about Carlos Beltran and Luis Castillo not visiting wounded soldiers at Walter Reed Hospital, despite the visit being a voluntary team trip (Beltran was in Puerto Rico, helping with the logistics of  building a school that his charitable foundation was spearheading); the uproar that Citi Field, opened in 2009, had more Brooklyn Dodgers stuff than it did Mets (which it didn’t); the uproar that the Mets did not don the caps of New York emergency services groups during the game played on 9/11/11 (because, doing so would defy the explicit orders of Major League Baseball); the controversy that Jose Reyes successfully bunted for a hit and pulled himself out of the game afterwards to maintain his lead in the batting title in the last game of the 2011 season (despite this being done by a host of other players over the years, at various times); the controversy that Johan Santana really didn’t throw the first no-hitter in Mets history, because a ball hit by Carlos Beltran that nicked the foul line was actually fair (which it wasn’t, because the umpire ruled it foul, despite where it actually landed). I’m sure I could go on.

This past week was the Major League All-Star Game. David Wright, in the middle of a MVP-type season, participated in the game, but wasn’t voted in as a started. Pablo Sandoval, the third baseman of the San Francisco Giants had that honor. With voting ending that Tuesday, David Wright was ahead of his closest competitor- Sandoval- by some 460,000 votes on June 26th. When the votes were counted after the voting period ended two days later, Sandoval outpaced Wright by 1.6 million votes. How did this happen? How did, as Mets General Manager Sandy Alderson put it on Twitter, a city of 800,000 outvote a city of 8,000,000? Simply put? Foul play.

It is important to note that the MLB does not prohibit fans from voting multiple times. It is actually encouraged, with fans being allowed to vote up to 25 times for the players they think should participate in baseball’s Midsummer Classic- likely to be able to boast inflated ballot totals, suggesting more interest in the game, the process, or the sport than might actually exist in reality. This is where the rules end, though. A person simply needs to create another e-mail address to be able to vote an additional 25 times and bypass the limit of 25 votes per individual. While this is something that we can assume with regularity, it certainly is against the spirit of the rules, and the notion of ‘fairness’. And yet, on Tuesday June 26th, the Giants hosted a “Super Tuesday” party, where a party was thrown for select fans to vote for San Francisco Giants players to their hearts content. According to the Giants’ official website, the team invited 15 fans who won a contest that involved them tweeting about how much they had already been voting for Giants players. A conference room at AT&T Park, the home of the Giants, was set up as ‘Campaign Headquarters’, where the 15 fans were provided with refreshments and computers where “they used different e-mail addresses to vote as many times as they could for [Giants] players”. According to Bryan Srabian, the San Francisco Giants Director of Social Media, “We wanted to take the chance to not only reward them, but ask them to help us. We asked them to come in and spend the game voting. This is just all about our fans getting behind a special campaign like this. It’s exciting.”

How did the mainstream media and blogosphere react? Here are a few samples of newspaper headlines and online article titles (click at your own risk; I don’t recommend giving these stories page views):

No every source has similar articles. Ernie Palladino from CBS New York rightly called for the vote to be taken away from fans, because of the questionable choices and blatant ballot stuffing (while not against the rules, certainly against the spirit of the rules, and the spirit of good sportsmanship). Reports like his are buried in the deluge of blame-the-Mets stories that echo the same elements that blame-the-victim stories contain, when about victims of crime. This is what I don’t understand. Wright being outvoted by Sandoval supporters, I can understand. The general reaction of the media, I don’t.

Remember, this is the media we are talking about, the sensationalistic, make-a-story-when-one-doesn’t-actually-exist, say whatever you have to say to sell the story media. If ever there was a time to write sensationalistic articles or ranting TV segments, this is the time. It seems almost tailor made: After tallying around 3.7 million votes in the weeks leading up to the voting deadline, a player garners around two million votes- almost double what he had already accrued- in the span of two days, a seeming statistical impossibility without blatant foul play, such as, say, automatic computer scripts being written to vote for Sandoval being involved- and, surprise, surprise, Silicon Valley is within the area that San Francisco Giants ‘territory’ encompasses! Despite being against the spirit of the rules and competition, the Giants organization itself not only encouraged fans to create fake e-mail addresses, but actually aided them in doing so during their “Super Tuesday” event.

It really boggles the mind. The media- the New York media!- might actually have made a difference if it ran with this kind of story. Bud Selig, the commissioner of baseball, might have had his hand forced if the media hammered him with it. By and large, people don’t like the way the All Star Game roster is selected, because of the post-season implications the game now has. A potential World Series bound team is going to gain or lose home field advantage based on what amounts to a popularity contest (every year, more deserving players statistically take backseat roles to more popular players). The hornet’s nest that is New York was poked when David Wright- by all accounts a model citizen, guy you want to grow up to be, guy you could take home to mom- lost out to Pablo Sandoval- currently being investigated for sexual assault, known to have work ethic issues- under questionable circumstances. But instead of pushing the issue and asking hard, but valid, questions about not just this event, but the selection process in general, the media by and large opted to go the most LOLMets worthy route. This isn’t so much sour grapes as it is a moment of ‘shake my head’ clarity.


Gary Carter: Should ‘8’ Be Retired?

February 16, 2012

Less than a year ago, Gary Carter’s name found itself plastered on the back pages of newspapers across the country. On May 21st, 2011, Carter issued a statement to the press where he revealed that his doctors had discovered four small tumors in his brain. Biopsies done at Duke University concluded that the small tumors were malignant, and that the Hall of Fame catcher had brain cancer, likely inoperable. Glioblastoma multiforme, the form of cancer he was diagnosed with, had a poor prognosis, with the median survival time being a paltry 14 months. He took the news in stride, and kept in good spirits. Over the course of the year, he underwent assorted types of treatments. At times, the news looked good, and it seemed as if Carter would do the impossible- nothing new for the guy who stared defeat in the eyes multiple times in 1986 and not only survived unscathed, but ultimately triumphed- and somehow beat inoperable, deadly cancer. As 2011 turned into 2012, word out of the Carter camp wasn’t nearly as good. Though he was still fighting, his immune system and body were weakened by ordinary afflictions multiplied in severity by the cancer in his system, and the aggressive treatment he was receiving to keep it in check. Worse yet was the news that, despite all of the medical attention he was receiving, new tumors had been discovered by doctors. Carter himself kept in his spirits, as was seemingly his modus operandi in life, but the new news cemented the reality that, despite the aggressiveness of the treatment, despite the money to pay for the best doctors and facilities, despite the patient’s zest for life, he was a man living on extremely borrowed time. That reality came into clear focus on February 16th, 2012, when Gary Carter finally succumbed to the cancer that ravaged his body. In less than a year, he went from being a generally healthy 57-year-old physical specimen to yet another casualty of cancer, a testament to the fragility of life.

Carter’s MLB career spanned nineteen years, from 1974 to 1992. For the majority of the mid-to-late ‘70s and early-to-mid ‘80s, Carter was the premium catcher in all of baseball. In 1975, his first full season, he hit .270/.360/.416, with 17 home runs and 68 RBI, playing good defense. He was just edged out by San Francisco Giants pitcher John Montefusco for National League Rookie of the Year Award for 1975. During his 1976 season, he took some steps back offensively, but he returned to form in 1977, and never looked back until the twilight years of his career. During this period of time, he averaged 6.0 WAR a year, which his single best season coming in 1982, where he hit .293/.381/.510, with 29 home runs and 97 RBI, along with the exceptional defense behind the plate Carter was known for.

At the end of the 1984 season, after finishing fifth in the NL East, the Montreal Expos decided that it would be in their best interests if they unloaded their All-Star catcher in exchange for prospects, to begin the process of rebuilding. In exchange for Hubie Brooks, Mike Fitzgerald, Herm Winningham and Floyd Youmans, the New York Mets acquired Gary Carter. Carter made his impact immediately felt, as he hit a walk-off home run in the 10th inning of Opening Day 1985 against the St. Louis Cardinals, the Mets’ biggest rivals back during the ‘80s. For the next five years, Carter would be a mainstay behind the plate, an important piece for a bunch of Mets teams that regularly did well in the standings, including a playoff berth in 1988 and a championship in 1986.

Since the beginning of his Mets tenure, Carter had been steadily decreasing in ability, as age started catching up with him. After an ineffective 1989 season, where he played only 50 games, Carter was allowed to leave the Mets via free agency. He would play for three more seasons, getting behind the plate for the Giants, Dodgers, and Expos. During this three-year period, he recaptured enough of his former self to be somewhat effective, averaging a 1.3 WAR per season. After his swan song in Montreal, the city where it all started, Carter hung up his spikes and announced his retirement. For his career, he hit .262/.335/.439 with 324 home runs and 1,225 RBI, while playing premium defense for most of his career. These numbers were good for a 72.5 WAR for his career, putting his name among the best catchers in baseball history.

In 2001, ‘Kid’ was inducted into the Mets Hall-of-Fame. During his five-year tenure with the Mets, he hit .249/.319/.412 with 89 home runs, 349 RBI, and defense that, while not as good as it was in his prime, did not kill the team. More importantly, perhaps, was his .276/.267/.552 line for the 1986 World Series, his two home runs over the Green Monster, and his role in Game 6 of the World Series, where he not only hit the sac fly that tied the game in the 8th inning, but was the first batter in the 10th inning rally that eventually sealed the deal for the Mets. In 1988 and 1989, Carter was made co-captain, along with Keith Hernandez, in deference to his veteran presence and deep knowledge of the game. Two years later, in 2003, in his 6th year on the Hall of Fame ballot, Carter was voted in by the Baseball Writers Association of America with 387 of the 496 possible votes. Half joking, Carter requested that the cap depicted on his plaque be half Expo, and half Met. Carter initially leaned towards wearing an Expos cap, and then leaned towards wearing a Mets cap. In the end, when the Hall of Fame made the final decision, it gave Carter an Expos cap, with Baseball Hall of Fame president Dale Petroskey stating that it was Carter’s time in Montreal that earned his induction, and that his time in New York alone would not have. That year, the Expos retired Carter’s number 8 uniform. The Mets have never retired it, but have yet to issue it again.

Around the time he was first diagnosed with cancer, the drumbeat to have his uniform number, 8, retired began. It grew louder as hours turned into day, and days turned into weeks, and we all digested the news. Carter was a fan favorite of many, so for hundreds of thousands of Mets fans, the news of his death sentence hit home. The story died back down in the background as the baseball season progressed and new stories and controversies emerged. With his death, Gary Carter will be certainly the primary story during this sports down period that exists in the transitory days baseball begins, but after football has concluded (no offense to hockey, which I like, but it and basketball do not generate the coverage that the big two of baseball and football do in New York City). Once more, the calls to have number 8 retired will be heard far and wide, and will likely reach a crescendo. The Mets will likely honor Carter by wearing a patch memorializing his death, but should they afford him the ultimate honor that a baseball organization can bestow upon a player, retiring their uniform number in perpetuity?

Most arguments in favor of retiring Gary Carter’s number can be summed up thusly: “He was a good player who won a championship, and a fan favorite. The number hasn’t been issued since Carter wore it, and since he’s now dead, it ought to be official”. Using the same argument, however, one could make the case that Willie Mays’ number 24 should be retired. Mays certainly was a fan favorite in New York City, and numbers be damned, former Mets owner Joan Payson vowed that no regular player would wear it when the Hall of Fame centerfielder retired (It has since been issued twice, to Kelvin Torve in error, and Rickey Henderson). The Say Hey Kid, in the twilight of his career, played for the Mets for two years, 1972 and 1973, and hit .238/.352/.394 with 14 home runs, 44 RBI and 2 stolen bases. Are those numbers truly worthy of having a number retired?

A team retires a number based on the merit of the man that they’re retiring it in honor of, based on his tenure with the team, the stats he put up while with the team, his general impact on the team, with other intangibles augmenting all of that. Carter, as mentioned, played for the Mets for five years, and hit .249/.319/.412 with 89 home runs, and 349 RBI, good for a total of 13.2 WAR (2.6 averaged over that time). His defense was up and down, but generally was about net neutral through his total time with the team. In the 1986 playoffs, Carter hit .148/.207/.185 with 0 home runs and 2 RBI in the NLCS against the Houston Astros and .276/.267/.552 with 2 home runs and 9 RBI in the World Series against the Boston Red Sox. In the 1988 playoffs, Carter hit .222/.250/.333 with 0 home runs and 4 RBI in the NLCS against the Los Angeles Dodgers. Though numbers cannot particularly verify this, it is very likely that his veteran poise and knowledge helped the mid-to-late 1980s Mets pitching staff, which had numerous young pitchers, such as Doc Gooden, Ron Darling, Sid Fernandez and David Cone. In 1988 and 1989, respecting his status as veteran, his knowledgeable of the game, and his status as all-around good guy loved by fans and the media (he was always quick with a smile and a quote, and loved the opportunity that the big New York media afforded him), the Mets made him co-captain with Keith Hernandez. And, of course, he won a World Series championship ring with the 1986 team.

The argument for having Carter’s number 8 retired is heavily based on the intangibles, with a large amount of emotion from his sickness and subsequent death mixed in. These are poor arguments for something as important as a team retiring a player’s number in perpetuity. Retiring a player’s number is not something to be taken lightly- who doesn’t shake their head and scoff at the fact that Wade Boggs has his number 12 retired by the Tampa Bay Devil Rays? Boggs played for the Devil Rays for two years, 1998 and 1999, and hit .289/.360/.391 with 9 home runs, 81 RBI and a net negative UZR, good for a total of 1.3 WAR over that period of time. He probably was their best player, and those numbers aren’t horrible (especially the offensive numbers), but are they cause for a team to retire a player’s number? Absolutely not. The Colorado Rockies, for example, are just about as old as the Tampa Bay team, but they have yet to retire a player number because they have yet to find a player who played for the team long enough, at a level of play high enough.

To use a Mets analogy, using the same argument that is invoked in favor of retiring Gary Carter’s number- stats count to some degree, but the intangibles, such as rings, quotability, veteran presence, and other notions- can be used to argue in favor of retiring Lee Mazzilli’s ’13’ (or ’16’). Mazzilli had a similar slash line, albeit, he hit for less power- .264/.357/.396, with 68 home runs, and 353 RBI (and 152 stolen bases). He had the same kind of ‘veteran presence’ that Carter had. Being a teammate of Carter on the 1986 team, Mazzilli, too, has a World Series championship ring. Like Carter, he also was a media darling, and topped carter in that respect, being a homegrown Brooklyn boy who made the ladies swoon, and the guys wish they were him. Is there much of an argument, that Mazzilli should have his number retired, placing more of an emphasis on intangible things rather than stats? Then why Carter? Now, that is not to say Carter had bad stats, but they’re, all things taken into consideration, fairly pedestrian, especially for such a grand honor.

Thankfully, the Mets are seemingly not a team that retires player numbers on the drop of a hat. The Mets are extra stringent, when it comes to doing this- only a single player, Tom Seaver, has had his number retired over the course of the almost 50-year existence as a baseball team. Plenty of players who played before, with, or since Carter, who played on the Mets for a longer period of time and were more valuable: Jerry Koosman (12 year tenure, 3.09 Mets career ERA, 1969 World Series champion, and was worth a total of 41.8 WAR according to the historical WAR numbers provided by baseballprojection.com), Keith Hernandez (5 ½ year tenure, .297/.387/.429, 1986 World Series champion, 1987-1989 Mets team captain, and was worth a total of 28.4 WAR) and Mike Piazza (8 year tenure, .296/.373/.542, 31.2 WAR, first-ballot Hall-of-Famer come 2013) all fit the bill. Of those three, Mike Piazza is the only one who is likely to be honored by the Mets by having his number retired. The ships for Koosman and Hernandez seem to have sailed.

If such Mets luminaries such as Jerry Koosman, or Keith Hernandez have yet to have their numbers retired, and are unlikely to have them retired at this point, the chances that Gary Carter has his number retired is slim. The justification that Carter has his number retired, even slimmer and flimsier. Carter was an excellent baseball player during his nineteen year career, and is rightly a Hall of Famer. He became a Hall of Famer primarily because of his play in Montreal, not New York, and as such, there is no reason to retire his uniform number. Does this diminish his Mets career, his baseball legacy, or his personal legacy? Certainly not. His Mets stats do not warrant the honor, simply. Every time the government prints more currency, it devalues what it already has in circulation. The Mets have shown that they are interested in only retiring the super-elite, gold standard of franchise-defining players. It’s no knock on Gary Carter that he wasn’t a super-elite, gold standard of franchise-defining players. Most players aren’t. Most All-Star players aren’t.


On This Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Let Us Talk Of Baseball

January 16, 2012

Today is Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. Dr. King is the only American non-president to have his birthday marked as a federal holiday. Even more interesting, I think, is the fact that Martin Luther King, Jr. Day is celebrated in other countries, to varying degrees. Dr. King is, after all, synonymous with the peaceful message of basic equality, tolerance, and the respect of human dignity, regardless of race, religion, creed, and so on.

In the wider world, Dr. King is often seen as the symbol of human equality, and the plight for obtaining it. In the sphere of baseball, Jackie Robinson occupies that role. Robinson and King knew each other quite well, in fact, with their respective plights, tactics, and goals mirroring each other. Robinson was a supporter of King’s goals and methods, as was King of Robinson. In fact, King once said, “Jackie Robinson made it possible for me in the first place. Without him, I would never have been able to do what I did.”

More so than steroids, amphetamines, gambling scandals, spitballs, and the variety of things that players have done that generally embarrassed the sport of baseball (looking at things from a “holier-than-thou” attitude that many in the media, and those influenced by the media, take), the color barrier that prevented Black and certain Latin players from playing on MLB teams is the biggest embarrassment that Major League Baseball has to deal with in it’s long history.

It is true that baseball was not alone in the segregation of Blacks and Whites- almost all of American society, to varying degrees, engaged in passive or active segregation of some form. In 1867, the National Association of Base Ball Players decreed that “any club including one or more colored persons” would be banned. When the NABBP metamorphasized into various other leagues, among them the International League, American League, National Leagues, these rules laxed, and occasionally, teams fielded colored players, but both official declarations and gentlemen’s agreements reinstituted the color barrier, especially after influential players, such as Cap Anson publicly went on record as refusing to take the field playing with or against African-Americans and/or dark-skinned Hispanics. In later years, baseball commissioner Judge Kennesaw Mountain Landis would go out of his way to ensure that the “separate but equal” doctrine established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson was in effect in Major League Baseball, and that Blacks and Whites did not play on the same teams, with or against each other.

Being unofficially banned from playing organized baseball in the MLB did not stop colored athletes of the era from playing on amateur and semi-pro teams that would have them, as well as forming their own leagues and teams. From the turn of the 1900s to the 1950s, various teams in various leagues- collectively known as the Negro Leagues- organized games, tournaments, and made thousands and thousands of dollars (as was the case with the MLB, more often than not, organizers and team owners saw the majority of these proceeds, with players only receiving relative chump change). Among the many Negro League teams, many stand out- the Kansas City Monarchs, the Baltimore Elite Giants, the Newark Eagles, the New York Black Yankees, the Homestead Grays, and the Pittsburgh Crawfords, among others. These teams engaged in barnstorming tours with teams represented by and composed of numerous Major League players- Dizzy Dean and Bob Feller are among the most famous and celebrated MLB barnstormers- and proved beyond a reasonable doubt that colored ballplayers were in no means inferior to White ballplayers. Talent and ability were universal mores that were not limited by skin color.

Among the heyday of the Negro Leagues, numerous teams played, and various stars separated themselves as the cream of the blackball crop. In national newspapers, sadly, the Negro League teams and players rarely got much press coverage. At the same time, Black newspapers, often because of budget or space constraints, were unable to cover every game as well. This meant that, to this day, so much of what actually happened in so many games has been lost to the sands of time, and only survive in the minds of those who were there- an age group that is rapidly dwindling before our eyes. This lack of concrete information has caused so many Negro League greats to be forgotten. Be honest- how familiar are you with Oscar Charleston, a sensational defensive center fielder who was a true five-tool player, who was ranked by Bill James many years after his death as the fourth-best baseball player of all time? Or Judy Johnson, a third baseman with the defensive prowess of Brooks Robinson and the offensive prowess of George Brett? Or “Double Duty “Radcliffe, the oldest man to throw a pitch at a baseball game (he was 103 when he threw out the ceremonial first pitch for the White Sox in 2005), who both pitched and caught- and he excelled at both, as well as hitting? How about “Turkey” Stearnes, the sensational center fielder whose lifetime batting average (.350) was almost double his average playing weight (165 lbs.)? The list goes on and on. Three of those four, Johnson, Charleston, and Stearnes are Hall of Famers, to boot, inducted in 1975, 1976, and 2000, respectively.

As a sort of silver lining, in my own mind, this gives so much of Negro League baseball a mythic feel to it. Cool Papa Bell, for example, was said to have been so fast that “you can turn off the light and be under the covers before the room gets dark!” With this is no doubt an exaggeration on the part of Satchel Paige (another legendary and mythic persona in his own right) on behalf of Bell, it gives Bell’s speed a sort of mythic, Herculean quality, one that might not exist had Bell’s speed been better documented and measured. We all know that Jose Reyes is fast, can time the total time it takes for him to round the bases, but do flowery, anecdotal stories exist that paint his blazing speed in such light? Josh Gibson is said to have hit almost 800 home runs in his career, though only about 200 are actually documented. In one story, he is said to have hit a ball so far and high during a twilight game that it disappeared from view. The next day, when the same teams played around the same time, a ball supposedly fell from the sky somewhere, and was caught by an outfielder, prompting the umpire to call Gibson “out- in Pittsburgh, yesterday!” Some of his prolific power might have been fabricated, but those fabrications further perpetuate and fuel the myth of Josh Gibson, which, in turn, further perpetuates and fuels Major League Baseball, an often-times mythic entity in its own right.

The Negro Leagues began folding shortly after Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier in the National League, and Larry Doby broke the color barrier in the American League, casting aside the baseball social mores that prohibited teams from signing colored players, something most began doing en masse (with the famous exceptions being the Yankees and the Red Sox). By the end of the 1950s, the institution was dead- the sole exception were the Indianapolis Clowns, but by that point, they all but stopped fielding competitive teams in lieu of comic acts and entertainment- a baseball version of the Harlem Globetrotters. The end of the Negro Leagues was bittersweet, however. Their purpose was to give Black and Hispanic ballplayers who were unfairly barred from the Major Leagues an outlet to exhibit their talents. With the color barrier eliminated, and these men free to play in the MLB, there simply was no more reason for the Negro Leagues. The year 1971 would see a Major League ballclub, the Pittsburgh Pirates, field an all-Black/Hispanic starting lineup, on September 1st. Rennie Stennett, Gene Clines, Roberto Clemente, Willie Stargell, Manny Sanguillen, Dave Cash, Al Oliver, and Jackie Hernandez, compromised the starting lineup, while Dock Ellis.

Looking at my own baseball team, the Mets, they were formed and began operating long after the color barrier was broken, and by then, black ballplayers were no longer uncommon. Sadly, the Mets are not without unfortunate, seeming racial incidents of their own. The most famous- and most consequential- took place in 1966, when the New York Mets, in their first selection in the 1966 Amateur Draft, the second selection overall, selected catcher Steve Chilcott. The Kansas Athletics, who drafted next, selected outfielder Reggie Jackson. As we all know, Jackson would go on to become a Hall of Famer, while Chilcott never made it to the MLB, because of various injuries. According to Jackson, the Mets passed over Reggie because of the fact that they were concerned over character issues he had- mainly, the fact that he had a white girlfriend, as was known to prefer white women over black women. Joe McDonald, Director of Minor League Operations and Scouting at the time, stated that the Mets bypassed Jackson because they were drafting according to need, and at the time, they needed a catcher. Steve Chilcott, though his career never panned out, was highly regarded- he wouldn’t have been such a high draft pick if he wasn’t. At the same time, however, George Weiss, the Mets GM at the time, was known as a racist and bigot. Part of the reason that the Yankees (he was their Minor League coordinator in the late ‘50s) went into a steep decline after their dominance in the 1950s was because Weiss specifically did not want to draft and/or sign Black and/or Latin players (many of whom were stars in the Negro Leagues). It is more than likely that Weiss’ bigoted attitudes influenced the Mets’ decision to pass over Jackson. Had the Mets drafted Jackson, who knows what might have happened?

Various Black and Latin players donned the Mets uniform over the years. The first to do so were Charlie Neal and Felix Mantilla, who did so in 1962. The Amazin’ Miracle Mets had a trio of Black players who were instrumental in the team winning its first World Series victory. Cleon Jones was the first to appear in a Mets uniform, debuting in 1963, but finally sticking as a starter in 1966. An All-Star in 1969, Jones is best remembered for being benched by Gil Hodges after not hustling after a ball (though, according to Jones, in reality, he had actually hurt his ankle, but let the team think that Gil had pulled him for that reason, to re-instill a sense of ‘duty’ in all players on the team), as well as the shoe-polish ball. In 1991, Cleon Jones was inducted into the Mets Hall of Fame. Tommie Agee joined the club in 1968, and is best remembered for making a pair of amazing catches during Game 3 of the World Series (as well as hitting a home run off of Orioles Hall of Famer Jim Palmer), as well as being the only Met player to ever hit a home run into Shea Stadium’s left field upper deck (specifically, Section 48, about halfway up). Donn Clendenon joined the Mets a year later, and became the eventual 1969 World Series MVP with his tremendous .357/.438/1.071 slash line. Tommy Agee was inducted into the Mets Hall of Fame in 2002.

The Mets of the 1980s featured a trio of Black players, who were instrumental to the team winning the World Series in 1986. Mookie Wilson was the first to debut, making brief appearances in 1980 and 1981 before becoming a full-time starter in 1982. Mookie set team records for stolen bases and triples, that would stand for years, but he’s best remembered for the Bill Buckner play in Game 6 of the World Series- an at-bat where he deftly jumped out of the way of a wild pitch to allow the tying run to score, and then outran the most famous “little roller up along first” in Mets history as the Mets came back to win the game- and eventually, the series. In 1993, Mookie Wilson was inducted into the Mets Hall of Fame. Darryl Strawberry came next, debuting in a 1983 season that would earn him Rookie of the Year honors. The eventual six-time All Star would spend eight years with the Mets, and during that span, Darryl hit .263/.359/.520, while flashing excellent speed and a plus glove- qualities that should have netted him an MVP Award in 1988. In 2010, Darryl Strawberry was elected into the Mets Hall of Fame. Last, but certainly not least, was Doc Gooden, who debuted in 1984 with a record-setting Rookie of the Year campaign. As amazingly good as he was in 1984, Gooden outdid himself, pitching one of the most statistically dominating seasons in baseball history, good for the 1985 Cy Young Award. Twenty-four wins, sixteen complete games, eight shutouts, 276.2 innings pitched, 8.72 strikeouts per nine innings, a 2.13 FIP, a 1.53 ERA, and a 9.0 WAR. What more needs to be said?

Jose Reyes, current Mets superstar, likely would never have been afforded the ability to play professional baseball had the color line not been crossed. Carlos Beltran would likely have been in the same boat. Met legend Keith Hernandez probably would have made it to the MLB, though. The barrier preventing Hispanic players was a lot more amorphous, but as a general rule of thumb, the darker your skin was, and the heavier your accent was, the less likely it was for you to get a job on a Major League ball club- especially if you came from the Caribbean.

The game of baseball has truly become an international game, a game in which skill, not race, is most important. In 1995, Hideo Nomo came to the United States and trail blazed the path for other Japanese pitchers to come to the U.S. and play in the MLB (note- he wasn’t the first Japanese pitcher to play in the MLB. That honor goes to Masanori Murakami, who played two seasons with the San Francisco Giants in 1964 and 1965 as a baseball “exchange student”). In 2006, the first World Baseball Classic was held- and, since the inaugural WBC, more countries have vied to join in the mix. In 2008, the Pittsburgh Pirates signed Rinku Singh and Dinesh Patel, making them the first two Indians to sign a contract with a MLB club. As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would approve of, baseball has become colorblind.

As an afterwards, it is important to remember the legacy of Buck O’Neil, the first baseman and manager of the Kansas City Monarchs. As a player, he played for twelve full seasons, losing 1945 and 1946 to military service. His stats were decent, but were far from mind-blowing. Likewise, his Negro Leagues managerial career could be summed up similarly. O’Neil was the driving force behind the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum in Kansas City, and the renewed light shined on the Negro Leagues. Going into the ‘90s, many Negro League stars had been enshrined in the Hall of Fame already. Many older or borderline players had been forgotten, however, and it was through Buck’s intrepid perseverance that, asides for a renewed interest in the Negro Leagues, 17 deserving Negro League players, managers, and executives were elected into the Hall in 2006. Buck himself was not elected by the special committee, and many found that something of a travesty. As for Buck himself, he had this to say, “God’s been good to me. They didn’t think Buck was good enough to be in the Hall of Fame. That’s the way they thought about it and that’s the way it is, so we’re going to live with that. Now, if I’m a Hall of Famer for you, that’s all right with me. Just keep loving old Buck. Don’t weep for Buck. No, man, be happy, be thankful”. Buck O’Neil was an outstanding man with an infectious smile (seriously, take a listen at his speech made in Cooperstown in 2006), a profound knowledge of baseball, whose dedication to baseball off-the-field, especially in his later years, had an large impact on the game, and how we perceive and remember it. Buck O’Neil is a Hall of Famer in my book. If Walter O’Malley can be enshrined for becoming majority owner an already successful franchise, moving out west, and continuing being a successful franchise, and if George Steinbrenner can, as will likely happen, be enshrined for buying a failing franchise and pumping so much money into it that it could not possibly fail, I think there’s room somewhere in Cooperstown for Buck O’Neil.

Further Recommended Reading:

Gay, Timothy- Satch, Dizzy, and Rapid Robert: The Wild Saga of Interracial Baseball Before Jackie Robinson (2010)

Lanctot, Neil- Negro League Baseball: The Rise and Ruin of a Black Institution (2008)

O’Neil, Buck- I Was Right On Time (1997)

Peterson, Robert- Only the Ball Was White: A History of Legendary Black Players and All-Black Professional Teams (1992)

Posnanski, Joe- The Soul of Baseball: A Road Trip Through Buck O’Neil’s America (2007)

Rogosin, Donn- Invisible Men: Life in Baseball’s Negro Leagues (2007)

Tygiel, Jules: Shades of Glory: The Negro Leagues and the Story of African-American Baseball (2006)


Steroids, Cheating, And Media Hypocrisy

December 30, 2011

January begins the new year, and among various other things, it marks the 2012 Baseball Hall of Fame class. The potential Baseball Hall of Fame Class of 2012 has some degree of star power, not so much from first-time candidates- of whom, the most notable players are former Yankee centerfielder Bernie Williams, Angels right fielder Tim Salmon, and journeyman right fielder Jeremy Burnitz- but from holdover candidates from previous years. Among them are Mariners DH Edgar Martinez, Astros first baseman Jeff Bagwell, Athletics/Cardinals first baseman Mark McGwire, Blue Jay/Brave first baseman Fred McGriff, Rangers/Orioles first baseman Rafael Palmiero, Reds shortstop Barry Larkin, Montreal left fielder Tim Raines, Rockies right fielder Larry Walker and Tigers pitcher Jack Morris. Between the group of them, there are multiple MVP awards, Silver Slugger awards, Gold Glove awards, and All-Star nods. With certain names, there’s been quite a bit of trepidation, in terms of justifying their inclusion in Cooperstown, outside of the general ‘their stats don’t justify it’, most notably, Mark McGwire, Rafael Palmiero, Jeff Bagwell, and Edgar Martinez. Getting him out of the way quickly, with Martinez, many people believe that a full-time DH should not be enshrined in the Baseball Hall of Fame (despite the DH begin a legal position since 1973, and ignoring the fact that Martinez is a six-time All-Star with multiple MVP votes, who is a career .312/.418/.515 hitter, whatever one thinks about the position). With Mark McGwire, Rafael Palmiero, and Jeff Bagwell, voting members of the Baseball Writers Association of America are hesitant, or are seen as being hesitant, to vote for players who have engaged in steroid/HGH use- substances I will simply refer to as PEDs (Performance Enhancing Drugs) from here on in. In the case of Bagwell, this is very unfortunate, and is more or less defamation and libel, because despite everything that has been said about him and PEDs, he’s never failed any tests, or even been linked to anything suspect in any way, outside of media individuals and fans broadly implicating anybody who played during baseball’s ‘Steroid Era’, and put up halfway decent numbers.

Mark McGwire and Rafael Palmiero are different cases. Mark McGwire, after years of speculation based on his career numbers, choosing to not talk about his use of PEDs during Congressional testimony, and claims made by the “Godfather of Steroids”, Jose Canseco in his book, Juiced: Wild Times, Rampant ‘Roids, Smash Hits & How Baseball Got Big, admitted to using PEDs in a press conference in 2011, shortly after the St. Louis Cardinals hired him as hitting coach. Rafael Palmiero, shortly after standing in front of a Congressional hearing and saying Let me start by telling you this: I have never used steroids, period. I don’t know how to say it any more clearly than that. Never”, tested positive for having a potent PED, Stanozolol. Though he claimed innocence, and there certainly is a great deal of circumstantial evidence to suggest that he never knowingly took the PED that caused him to fail the test, he was also named in Jose Canseco’s book, and in the affidavit of Jason Grimsley, the Arizona Diamondback pitcher who was implicated in taking and distributing PEDs to players across the MLB.

Cheating isn’t anything new to society, and it certainly isn’t new to baseball. In fact, baseball has a rich history of cheating. Shortly after the rules for base ball were codified in the mid 1800s, players began devising new and inventive ways to break them. When men were on base, infielders dropped infield fly balls on purpose, to be able to make the double play. As a player, Hall of Famer manager John McGraw was known to hook his finger in the belt of baserunners at third base, in an attempt to make it harder for them to get a good jump to tag up on a flyball. During the 1900 season, in an amazingly complicated scheme, the Philadelphia Phillies stole signs via telescope from the center field clubhouse and relayed them to the third base coach via electrical impulses that the coach felt in his metal cleats from a buried wire that went from the centerfield clubhouse to the third base coaches box. Since those early days, as baseball became more organized and more of a business, more formal rules banning certain behaviors came into existence, but even still, they were regularly broken. After the 1920 season, with the exception of a small group of pitchers, spitballs were banned and no foreign substances could be legally put on the ball. That didn’t stop Lew Burdette, Preacher Roe, Gaylord Perry, and countless others from throwing spitballs- in fact, Preacher Roe credited a lot of his success not to the spitball directly, but to the batter being psyched out and thinking he was going to give them a constant stream of wet ones. After the 1940 season, the rules were amended to state that a bat must be fashioned out of one singular piece of wood. That didn’t stop Norm Cash, Albert Belle, and Sammy Sosa from regularly engaging in the practice.

Generally speaking, drugs and injected/imbibed substances have carried more weight, when it comes to cheating in baseball. Greenie use- psychostimulants nicknamed thusly because of the color of the pills- is said to have begun in the 1940s. These small doses of amphetamines sped up the heart rate, increasing alertness and reaction time, and fought fatigue, letting the athlete perform at higher levels for longer. More potent forms of psychostimulants- cocaine, for example, were also regularly used by ballplayers. From the 1940s on, until even today, it is estimated that between 50 and 80 percent of ballplayers have used greenies of varying intensities to one degree or another, be it trying it once, or being a career user. Hall of Famers Mike Schmidt, Willie Stargell, Willie Mays are known to have downed greenies from time to time, notable players Keith Hernandez, Tim Raines, Dave Parker, and Vida Blue all used cocaine to varying degrees. As anyone who follows baseball today knows, the ‘Steroid Era’ began in the late 1980s, when PED use around the MLB exploded. As a result, I don’t need to go into much detail about it, other than

Plenty of moralizing has been made regarding steroids. Most of it comes from TV or radio hosts and newspaper/blog columnists, who need sensationalized topics to garner viewers, listeners, subscribers and pageviews. Unfortunately, a great deal of those who are doing this in an official capacity (as in, paid) are voting members of the Baseball Writers Association of America, and it’s sad that the BBWAA operates in this manner. In 2000, when slugger Albert Belle retired, New York Daily News writer Bill Madden opined, “Sorry, there’ll be no words of sympathy here for Albert Belle. He was a surly jerk before he got hurt and now he’s a hurt surly jerk….He was no credit to the game. Belle’s boorish behavior should be remembered by every member of the Baseball Writers’ Association when it comes time to consider him for the Hall of Fame”. Ignored by Madden is the fact that, in his 12 year career, Belle hit .295/.369/.564, was a five-time All-Star, won five Silver Slugger Awards, and received numerous MVP votes, a borderline Hall of Famer. New York Times writer Robert Lipsyte promptly pointed out the idiocy Madden was calling for, writing, “Madden is basically saying, ‘He was not nice to me, so let’s screw him”.

In effect, Bill Madden was saying to his readers, and other Hall of Fame voters, that a player’s character should outweigh his career statistics. It doesn’t matter how Albert Belle the baseball player was- he was an asshole! This argument is primarily being used now as a means to keep players who used PEDs out of the Baseball Hall of Fame. Did Mark McGwire accrue 70.6 WAR (Wins Above Replacement-level) over the course of his career? Doesn’t matter, he used steroids. Is Barry Bonds not Barry Bonds one of the greatest players to ever don a baseball uniform? Doesn’t matter, he used steroids. Is Larry Walker a career .313/.400/.565 hitter over the course of seventeen seasons? Doesn’t matter, he is alleged to have used steroids even though evidence even insinuating this doesn’t even exist! Now, keep in mind, the official guidelines for Baseball Hall of Fame voting do indeed say, “Voting shall be based upon the player’s record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character and contribution to the team(s) on which the player played.” Breaking laws (baseball or U.S. government), not breaking laws but certainly running contrary to the spirit of the law (baseball or U.S. government), do qualify as integrity, sportsmanship, and character issues. This aspect of voting is a relic of the past, I personally think, and problematic for the obvious reasons we’re seeing now, but it is still there nonetheless. The voting process has the woolly-headed moralizing directly built into it. At the same time, should character deficiencies overshadow stats and contributions to baseball? Cap Ansen was a horrible bigot who was instrumental in keeping Blacks out of baseball. That certainly qualifies as an integrity issue. Ty Cobb was a violent and overall nasty person. That certainly qualifies as a sportsmanship issue. Babe Ruth was known to be a womanizer who cheated on his wife, to the point the two were divorced. That certainly qualifies as an integrity issue. Should those personal, off-the-field issues overshadow their careers, to the point that their baseball stats are ignored? Or, would that be the pinnacle of stupidity, to bar three of the greatest players to ever play baseball from the Baseball Hall of Fame because of those issues that had nothing to do with their ability to play baseball?

Now, before anyone starts yelling, I’m not saying that I have no problem with players using PEDs. I don’t know very much about the negative physical impact taking PEDs can have on a person, but they certainly can’t be good for you over the long haul. I’m agnostic on the issue of whether or not they should be illegal, whether or not the MLB should consider them banned substances. All that matters to me is that they’re considered illegal substances, and have been banned in most forms since 2005. Even before that, they were dubious at best, and would have been against the spirit of the game, at the very least. Indeed, the MLB had no real PED policy until more recently. In 1971, Baseball Commissioner Bowie Kuhn issued the MLB’s first drug policy, which stated that all baseball personnel were to “comply with federal and state drug laws”. Vague language, coupled with no testing mechanisms resulting in the MLB’s drug policy being more or less a phantom, when it came to PEDs, many of which were technically legal to purchase with or without a doctor’s prescription. By the early 1990s, when PEDs were becoming more prevalent, Baseball Commissioner Fay Vincent released a memo that expanded the MLB’s drug policy to prohibit “the possession, sale or use of any illegal drug or controlled substance by Major League players or personnel…This prohibition applies to all illegal drugs … including steroids or prescription drugs for which the individual in possession of the drug does not have a prescription.” This policy still allowed for the loophole that came with performance enhancing that did not need a doctor’s prescription. It also lacked any kind of teeth, as still no testing mechanism existed, and the powerful Major League Baseball Players Association maintained the right to challenge any disciplinary action, resulting in many clubs and the MLB to not even bother bringing up players for disciplinary actions. And, realistically, why would they? Why would a team want to lose a key player for any length of time, or the MLB tarnish an image that had taken a huge hit during the strike-shortened 1994 season? It wasn’t until 2003 that a mechanism for testing players was established, and until 2005 that the current policy of 50, 100, and lifetime suspensions were agreed upon and enacted.

Since then, we’ve seen players get penalized for failures on drug tests related to PEDs. Ryan Braun, the reigning National League MVP tested positive for synthetic steroids, and was issued a 50 game suspension that he is appealing. Edinson Volquez tested positive for PEDs in 2010, and was suspended for 50 games as a result. Manny Ramirez tested positive for PEDs in 2009, and was suspended for 50 games as a result. J.C. Romero tested positive for PEDs during the 2008-2009 off-season, and was suspended for 50 games as a result. Since 2004, 66 players have been suspended for using PEDs. Is that not enough of a punishment? Doc Gooden, who was suspended a bunch of times in the late ‘80s and ‘early ‘90s, weren’t his punishments enough? Rules are rules, and punishments are punishments. The rules call for a violation of policies to be punished with suspensions. When these suspensions have been served, the player should no longer be penalized for his infraction.

By the time he retired, his career had fizzled out to the point that the Hall of Fame was not in his future, but did anybody see fit to seek to actively bar Gooden from the possibility to being enshrined in the Baseball Hall of Fame because of his cocaine suspensions? Gaylord Perry made no qualms with the fact that he threw a spitball, a pitch that has been deemed illegal by Major League Baseball for almost 100 years now. Has anyone saw fit to campaign to have him barred or removed from the Baseball Hall of Fame because of this? Mike Schmidt admitted to using amphetamines a bunch of times in his career. Has anyone saw fit to campaign to have him barred or removed from the Baseball Hall of Fame because of this? Willy Mays kept a red liquid that was some form of amphetamine in his locker, that he used as a pick-me-up. Has anyone saw fit to campaign to have him barred or removed from the Baseball Hall of Fame because of this? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Players who violate the rules should be punished, and that’s that. Nobody held, or is holding Gaylord Perry’s spitball use over his head. Nobody held, or is holding Mike Schmidt’s greenie use over his head. Nobody held, or is holding Willie Mays’ greenie use over his head.

What makes PED use any different from any other form of cheating that has been used in the MLB over it’s long history? I’ve heard that, because PED use was so much more prevalent than other forms of cheating, it should be viewed differently. Amphetamine use was as prevalent, if not more prevalent, in their heyday, from the 1940s until roughly the 1980s (when testing became more commonplace, and the Steroid Era began). Based on a few different player testaments, roughly 50%-60% of the MLB regularly used greenies. Where is the clamor that Tim Raines’ numbers are tainted because of his amphetamine use, and as such, his place on the ballot should be removed? I’ve heard that PED altered the entire game- stats, how we view them, the baseball establishment itself, in a way that other forms of cheating didn’t, so it should be viewed differently. At the end of the day, individual stats were still influenced, and individual stats have also been influenced by other forms of cheating. Would Gaylord Perry have been a Hall of Famer without his spitball? Would Tim Raines have accumulated the numbers he did without the energy pick-me-up that greenies provided him?

At the end of the day, people need to remember that PEDs are one form of cheating, out of many forms of cheating. They are, or were, currently en vogue, but when something new comes along, their appeal will diminish. When their appeal diminishes, they will be viewed through the lens of history, not through contemporary moral outrage. Though no one denies that spitballs, or amphetamine use are just as much forms of cheating, who moralizes about those anymore? In the 1920s, Commissioner Mountain Landis railed against the spitball as baseball’s second greatest threat, behind gambling. In the 1980s, the Pittsburgh Drug Trials scandalized baseball and drug use became a massive taboo. Now, when players get punished for doctoring the ball, we shrug, and when players get suspended for illegal drug use, we hope they kick the habit and get better. No moralizing or over-the-top hysteria. PEDs are just another form of cheating. Players who use them get punished, and that’s that. No need for the hysteria we are currently faced with- especially when it is applied so hypocritically. Cheating is cheating, and that is that.